vnud29 wrote:Did anyone know that KFC grows their own chickens to slaughter? I mean....I suppose its a good thing since if they didnt a lot of the chicken produced would be bought by them...but on the downside they seriously PACK the cages they grow them in. WHICH! Brings up the issue of animal cruelty which I don't want to talk about since its a nasty issue. ALSO! Did you know that they check the chickens for tumors before they kill them? Apparently, two tumors is ok....But if there's three! It can't be processed.
Errr, since my college degree deals with some of this, let me see if I can provide some sort of reasoning behind some it. KFC produces and slaughters their own chickens most likely because of economics. It's more economically feasible if you can cut out the middle man and vertically integrate most of your business, since it keeps the cost of production down. If you can keep your cost of production down, and your sales high, then you make more profit. Also, I've heard that they're kinda picky about the various sizes and weights of parts of the chicken. Take, for example, if a drumstick is larger than what they plan for, then it will use up more batter. Which will cause them to have to make/order more and spend more money. If a drumstick if smaller, then the customer is unhappy because they feel cheated out of their money and potentially won't come back. Oh, and I'm pretty sure that controlling the genetic makeup and breeding programs of the birds play a huge part in it too. As for packing the cages, chickens don't really need a lot of room to maximize growth and remain healthy, so why waste the space by giving them more room when they don't need it? Actually, they don't really live all that long as it is, so it's kind of a moot point in my opinion. And as for the tumors thing, I'm not a veterinarian, but in my opinion one or two tumors (and nothing else visibly wrong with the bird) give a reasonable indication that the tumors are benign and not malignant. If there are three or more, then yeah, I'd say that the bird needs to be put down.
And this is kinda a pet peeve of mine, but the USDA inspectors will NOT allow any animal slaughtered for human consumption to enter the our food supply if any trace of antibiotics remains in the carcass. Which means, that when companies say they have antibiotic free chicken, they're running a marketing gimmick intended to play off of this growing popular opinion of buying only "free of this and free of that" because the chicken is already free of all traces of antibiotics when it's served to you on your plate! Gah, I do dislike the marketing techniques of some companies, they twist the truth a bit and get people all freaked out for no reason at all, other than to bring in more customers than their competitors.
Hey Thobuon! How's it going? I'm glad you found the forum!