AJMArks wrote:A recent comment in another thread made me realize I have another big pet peeve. When reading Xena and Gabrielle fanfiction and they in ancient Greece it peeves me when modren values about gays and lesbians are put into that time period. Back then I doubt anyone would have cared if Xena and Gabrielle were lovers considering this was a time period where older men were encouraged to have younger men (boys actually) as lovers. I doubt it would have been seen as evil, immoral or anything else.
Well, L13 has already stated my thoughts almost exactly, so I won't say much on that. But I will add that I seem to remember from my history classes back in college (it was a long time ago, so bear with me if I'm mistaken) that homosexuality (male, at least) wasn't even recognised in mediaeval England - people slept with who they wanted. And I believe the reason why there were laws against sodomy/male homosexuality in the UK for so long and not lesbiansim is because Queen Victoria could imagine two guys going at it but couldn't figure out what two women would get up to, and so dismissed it as an impossibilty. Or is that just a historical myth?

And wasn't it supposed to be Vic herself who said she didn't care what two consenting adults got up to "so long as they don't do it in the streets and frighten the horses"?

(Always loved that quote.)
But one a more serious note, one of my pet peeves is almost the complete reverse of yours, although I wouldn't phrase it in quite the same way. I dislike fanfic set in any historical era in which our heroines' sexuality is generally accepted but the setting indicates it shouldn't be. Mel/Janice stories are usually very guilty of this. It's not so bad in those eras which historically sexuality is accepted or ignored but in settings where it would be frowned upon or worse, to make everyone happy and okey-dokey with our heroines being together just seems like fantasy. One or two people accepting things is excusable; more than that just seems ridiculous. As always, I suppose it depends on the exact setting and the talent of the author.
The stupid thing is, this issue makes a perfect conflict and that's what all drama revolves around. It doesn't have to be the driving force of the conflict in the story, but it has to be there. It's kind of like the subplot of Fritz and Natalia in
Cabaret: the main conflict is the rise of the Nazis and the problems that causes Sally (due to her 'decadent' lifestyle) and Brian (who is gaybisexual), but obviously Fritz and Natalia have to contend with their own religion and the danger that places them in.
And besides, aren't stolen kisses so much more appealing?
That's just MHO, of course. I know a lot (most?) of readers don't want to read about this prejudice and bigotry (there's enough of that in the real world, after all), and I understand that. It's just I want to read about real characters with real problems, not some two-dimensional cypher (there's enough of those on TV and in movies and published books, after all). It's my desire for realism (even in the fantastical), I guess. I can put up with this kind of thing in stories which are supposed to be lighthearted and fun romps, but not anywhere else.
The same goes for every single woman in every scene in the story being either gay or at least in the closet. And of course, immediately attracted to one or both of our heroines and practically throwing themselves at them. That just pisses me off.
A lot of people have mentioned names and the various reasons they annoy people. I dislike 'meaningful' names. Don't get me wrong, I think all names should be chosen for a reason and therefore have meaning, but it's that two-dimensional thing again. "My character is dark and broody, so I'll call her Raven" or "Our heroine is an enternal optimist so she's called Sunny" or... well, you get the idea.
You know something else that annoys me? People who post in forums and ramble on and on and on and on and on... Sorry guys, I just realised how long this post was. And I should be writing too. Shame on me.
